Model: I thought your model was beautiful. it was well finished and gave an excellent representation of your concept.
Poster 1: The spacial layout of your poster made it clear and readable. The anthropometric diagrams were well integrated into functions and did not take up the whole space...leaving room to spread out your concept ideas...well done. I do think that the colour used in your bubble diagram was slightly to bold...it has the effect of constantly leading the eye to that position on the poster...if you wanted this I would suggest making the diagrams more refined to keep the poster's beauty.
Poster 2: Again a good layout showing a very clear and easy to follow path through your design process. Some drawing a bit hard to read...but not too bad. Does leave me wondering about the demountability of your minima...or how it is transported at least.
Poster 3: The plan is very clear about the minima's, function and materiality.Inclusion of anthropometric diagrams excellent. You also have a great site perspective showing the integration with your site. My suggestion would be to make the site plan/location smaller so you had room for a section or two.
Thanks heaps on your comment Liz, i didnt realize the bold diagrams not until you mention it.. now i look at it again..it really does look kinda bold..haha!
I reckon the 2nd concept development Poster is what everyone struggling with...I find it really hard to get across your initial sketch concept to the viewers...Maybe the step guides in my concept development wasn't clear enough...I'll work on it!
About demountability, i did not emphasize it too much in the poster due to the simplicity of my design..simply slide it in then its ready to be demounted, perhaps i should show it clearer.. Maybe I've missed this point and lowered my marks..
And the last 3rd poster, i've used the model to show my section, therefore i didnt want to repeat the information that has been shown. But you do have a point there..perhaps another direction of a section cut could be slotted into the 3rd poster =)
Thanks again for your comments Liz, i think you did point out something that need to be improved!
3 comments:
very impressive images of ur model!
why didn't put them on ur posters?
hey David,
Great presentation!
Model:
I thought your model was beautiful. it was well finished and gave an excellent representation of your concept.
Poster 1:
The spacial layout of your poster made it clear and readable. The anthropometric diagrams were well integrated into functions and did not take up the whole space...leaving room to spread out your concept ideas...well done.
I do think that the colour used in your bubble diagram was slightly to bold...it has the effect of constantly leading the eye to that position on the poster...if you wanted this I would suggest making the diagrams more refined to keep the poster's beauty.
Poster 2:
Again a good layout showing a very clear and easy to follow path through your design process.
Some drawing a bit hard to read...but not too bad.
Does leave me wondering about the demountability of your minima...or how it is transported at least.
Poster 3:
The plan is very clear about the minima's, function and materiality.Inclusion of anthropometric diagrams excellent. You also have a great site perspective showing the integration with your site.
My suggestion would be to make the site plan/location smaller so you had room for a section or two.
All in all great work.
Liz
Thanks heaps on your comment Liz, i didnt realize the bold diagrams not until you mention it.. now i look at it again..it really does look kinda bold..haha!
I reckon the 2nd concept development Poster is what everyone struggling with...I find it really hard to get across your initial sketch concept to the viewers...Maybe the step guides in my concept development wasn't clear enough...I'll work on it!
About demountability, i did not emphasize it too much in the poster due to the simplicity of my design..simply slide it in then its ready to be demounted, perhaps i should show it clearer.. Maybe I've missed this point and lowered my marks..
And the last 3rd poster, i've used the model to show my section, therefore i didnt want to repeat the information that has been shown. But you do have a point there..perhaps another direction of a section cut could be slotted into the 3rd poster =)
Thanks again for your comments Liz,
i think you did point out something that need to be improved!
Post a Comment